History vs aftercare code
When a home health agency gets a referral for a diagnosis that is resolved but not necessarily with surgery (c.diff, pneumonia, UTI, etc) what are you using for the primary diagnosis? Often times it is therapy heavy for weakness, etc but coding guidelines indicate not to code a symptom (weakness) when the cause (infection, sepsis, etc) is known. I have typically used a history code as primary as the nurse will often be needed to educate on s/sx and prevention of recurrence. I have recently had it questioned if a history code can or should be listed as primary. I don't see anything in the coding guidelines/conventions other than under aftercare. I do see Z51.89 other specified aftercare. Should this be primary and the history z code second?
Thanks in advance!
Thanks in advance!
Comments
This may be arguable by some, but to me, if I see a patient suffering from unusual extreme weakness with a bout of pneumonia that has completed their course of antibiotics, who says their condition is now resolved? Antibiotic course completion does not mean resolution of the acute condition at that moment if one truly understands pharmacology. My understanding of pneumonia is that some take a month to recover back to their baseline. Why would one not use pneumonia as a primary diagnosis? Same for UTI. If a person is not back to their baseline, then are they truly in a "resolved" status? I do not consider not using UTI and pneumonia, etc just because the antibiotics are completed.
Food for thought.
Nancy Wolverton RN, CCM, HCS-D
Kindred at Home
Little Rock, Arkansas
501-508-8526
Nancy.Wolverton@kindred.com
I agree with Nancy..as long as the assessing clinician clearly documents that symptoms remain and associates them with the disease process. Without that association, the documentation of symptoms only could be related to almost anything and not necessarily the condition that should be addressed (PNA, UTI). If the patient is no longer being actively treated (antibiotics, etc.) and there are no symptoms specified as associated with the condition in the assessment, I would feel the need to get more information from the clinician and/or the physician before coding nonspecifically.
Andrea Michelle Smith, BSN, RN, COS-C, BCHH-C
Utilization Review Specialist
Kindred at Home
Andrea Michelle Smith, BSN, RN, COS-C, BCHH-C
Utilization Review Specialist
Kindred at Home
Looks like the experts have spoken.
Nancy Wolverton RN, CCM, HCS-D-10
Utilization Review Specialist
Kindred at Home
Little Rock, Arkansas
501-508-8526 (o)
501-690-2027 (c)
Nancy.Wolverton@kindred.com
Nancy Wolverton RN, CCM, HCS-D-10
Utilization Review Specialist
Kindred at Home
Little Rock, Arkansas
501-508-8526 (o)
501-690-2027 (c)
Nancy.Wolverton@kindred.com